Information about the hotel does not correspond to reality

Written: 26 august 2023
Travel time: 31 july — 7 august 2023
Your rating of this hotel:
3.0
from 10
Hotel ratings by criteria:
Rooms: 3.0
Service: 5.0
Cleanliness: 5.0
Amenities: 1.0
The option was offered to me by the operator, as there were no seats available in Villa Venera, which I chose on the "Vacation" website. The operator did not warn that there is a villa with almost the same name in Budva - Simona Villa. Moreover, Simon Villa turned out to be very "secretive". And when I looked at the hotel offers offered to me by the operator, I did not see the description of Simon Villa at all. However, I read a good description and good reviews of Simon Villa. If I had seen information about Simon Villa when buying a tour, I definitely would not have bought this tour. Especially since there were good offers in the booking for those days.
This villa has no territory at all - it is a 3-story building that is being built almost close to the street. Nearby is another 3-story building - at a distance of half a meter from each other. Instead of a yard, there is a meter-wide asphalt path next to the building. Further along the path is the territory of another villa.
By the way, the real address of this villa is 16 Prve Proleterske, not 23 Prve Proleterske.

The taxi driver with whom we were going to the settlement barely found this villa.

The information that Simon Villa is on the second line is false. According to the existing classification, this is the 3rd line and beyond. According to the Google map, it is 850 meters to the sea, and the shortest road to the nearest beach is 1 km. We went to the cleanest Mogren beach in Budva, which is 2.3 km long. That is, going to the beach twice a day, so as not to be there in the heat at noon, was impossible.

The description stated that our room had a balcony. But even this information did not correspond to reality. There were 6 rooms on the floor, of which 4 actually had balconies. My number 12 had a second exit and was the only window in the room. This exit was to the common terrace, on which there were 2 tables, and to which there were also stairs. We used this terrace - rested there, ate, dried beach clothes. But residents of other rooms passed through the terrace all the time. It definitely cannot be considered a balcony.

But the worst, in my opinion, is room 13, next to mine.
Not only did it not have a balcony, it had no windows at all. More precisely, formally there is a window there, but it opens onto the blind wall of the neighboring house, which is 0.5 meters away. There is almost no daylight in this room. It is not clear who allowed people to live in this room? Is there any inspection in Budva?
When we checked in, they wanted to accommodate 2 girls in room 13 - they paid 40 euros to be moved to a better room.

I took the tour without meals. But those people who took the tour with breakfast had to go every morning to the place where they were fed, more than a kilometer away - to the shore of Slavyansky beach. It is unlikely that they were informed about this when they were sold the tour.
Translated automatically from Ukrainian. View original