Well, a very weak four

Written: 25 july 2013
Travel time: 15 — 22 june 2013
Who does the author recommend the hotel to?: For a relaxing holiday
Your rating of this hotel:
5.0
from 10
Hotel ratings by criteria:
Rooms: 4.0
Service: 3.0
Cleanliness: 3.0
Food: 8.0
Amenities: 6.0
Traveled with my husband in June 2013.
Pros: 1. Price - inexpensive (it cost $ 760 for two); 2. Nature is awesome, the sea, mountains... ; 3 Food - you can say excellent for slaughter.
Cons: state of repair - rooms (half of the rooms without balconies, and if there are very small ones, there is only enough space to stand), the rooms are small, the building itself, the pool, the territory (very small, practically none) - this, of course, is a triplet; and another big minus - the beds practically did not change and the cleaning of the room was disgusting, it seems that they did not clean it at all. ; The room was above the restaurant and the pool - the music is very loud every day until 11-12 am;
there is no own beach, sun loungers with umbrellas are paid, though not expensive, somewhere around 3 dollars.

I also didn’t like the very “unobtrusive” service from the tour operator, on the way from the airport and back they are brought to some mini shopping center (on the road) for 40 minutes, everything is very expensive there, they dine there themselves, and tourists go, need, even after the flight - very impudent, I would even say . .
It takes about 7-10 minutes to the sea, but when we drove we knew that this was the second line and agreed.
The contingent is 80% British.
Excursions were taken, but not at the hotel. On the street is much cheaper and the same thing.
Probably, in general, the impression is "Not very".
Translated automatically from Russian. View original