Rest for four

Written: 27 august 2009
Travel time: 16 — 26 august 2009
Who does the author recommend the hotel to?: For families with children; For recreation with friends, for young people
Your rating of this hotel:
7.0
from 10
Hotel ratings by criteria:
Rooms: 9.0
Service: 7.0
Cleanliness: 7.0
Food: 8.0
Amenities: 9.0
We rested in Solnechnogorsk for the first time - we decided to go for a change, since in recent years we have been resting in Kanak. We lived at the recreation center "Crimea" in junior suites - this is the first floor of the stone building, which is shown by travel agencies in the photographs (shower and toilet are shared by five rooms).
First, I would like to say about Solnechnogorsk in general - in principle, a good village, small, everything you need is there, but the beach just amazed me - it's a mixture of pebbles, algae and cigarette butts that no one cleans up. On the second day after our arrival, the waves began and the water became a terrible dirty brown color, it was simply impossible to force yourself to go into the sea, but the next day the water became cleaner.
And now about the recreation center itself - the base itself is not bad, clean, there is a playground, in the evening cartoons were shown to children on the big screen, football matches and films were broadcast to adults. Another plus is that the base is located on the outskirts of the village, so you can not hear the roar of discos.

The room is good, the furniture is new. As for the shower and toilet - the repair is good, it was cleaned every day, of course there was a queue especially when everyone came from the beach together, since there were 15 of us in five rooms, but at normal times it was always free.
The food at the base is also not bad, as in a normal "Soviet" canteen, not a restaurant, of course, but for the cost of 60 hryvnia it suited us perfectly (which pleased me personally - they gave dairy for breakfast only twice in ten days).
And now about the beach - about 250 steps really lead to it, but it’s better to go to this beach than to the village one - the beach is clean, cleaned every day, free sunbeds, few people, the water is clean, there are no these creepy cafes - in general we liked it. We first got to this beach on the fourth day of our vacation and after that we didn’t go to the village beach anymore, plus you can walk not along the stairs, but bypassing it.
And about the staff of the base - not bad people, quite friendly, but the administrator is a very unpleasant woman, it seems that she hates people and is simply forced to communicate with them.
In general, we quite liked the rest, mainly because we did not go to the village beach. The road, of course, strained, but the same vacationers like ourselves drove along it at breakneck speed, so we must first learn to follow the rules of the road ourselves.
And as a conclusion - Kanaka is better, but also much more expensive!
Translated automatically from Russian. View original