Roman disgrace

Written: 17 january 2010
Travel time: 8 — 11 january 2010
Who does the author recommend the hotel to?: For recreation with friends, for young people
Your rating of this hotel:
4.0
from 10
Hotel ratings by criteria:
Rooms: 5.0
Service: 6.0
Cleanliness: 3.0
Food: 8.0
Amenities: 5.0
It can be called a hotel with a stretch - several rooms bought out by a rather arrogant Italian owner in several entrances of a residential building. The location is really good, but that's where the benefits end. Most of the rooms are just dead little rooms, these are standards. What is called superior, more or less refurbished rooms of different sizes and conditions. We stayed in two couples in just two seperiors, one of which was the size of a bed + 10% for the rest of the area, the second is larger, but with windows (not double-glazed windows !! ) overlooking the street with one-way but round-the-clock traffic, so it was possible to sleep complicated. . The small room was located in the adjacent building with a passage to it through the back rooms of the hotel. 2 adjacent rooms on the floor are residential private apartments, in one of which a woman literally “howled” almost around the clock. To the question "what is it? " at the reception they answered that a mentally abnormal person lives there, and since this is a private sector, nothing can be done. . The canteen is located in an unheated room in the courtyard of the building. There is no breakfast even by Italian three-star standards, from hot - boiled eggs, which after ordering we were able to wait only once in three days, and then by the end of breakfast. In general, for 15 years of travel, it was not necessary to meet a more ugly hotel.
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Comments (0) leave a comment
Show other comments …
аватар