Your rating of this hotel:
3.0
from 10
Hotel ratings by criteria:
Rooms:
9.0
Service:
3.0
Cleanliness:
3.0
Food:
4.0
Amenities:
3.0
And that's why:
1. The establishment positions itself as a park hotel. It more or less worked out with the hotel - not once with the park, they began to improve the territory and threw it halfway (. In the so-called "lake" it’s not just swimming - you don’t want to walk along the banks. Most of the pavilions on the territory are cluttered, there is ash Jurassic period Plus, two abandoned construction sites adjoin the territory.
2. The concept of the institution. The Cote d'Azur, Provence and all that... It's not clear what side is the beach bar a la Miami and the under-pool instead of the Provencal rural cafe on the territory (and by all indications it was there originally) - it's not clear. Failed.
3. Numbers. Standard - purely double, you can't accommodate a child. Everything is fresh, design a la Provence with a claim to luxury, all appliances function flawlessly. And in all this splendor for three days, not the slightest sign of cleaning was found. It's ridiculous to talk about replacing at least towels. Failed.
4. Nutrition. Breakfasts and lunches, semi-buffet, acceptable in quality - but at a draconian price. Failed.
5. Not a good pool. A collapsible structure chest-deep for a 12-year-old child. And they promised a major... Well, how it fits into the concept of the hotel - I already noted above. Failed.
In general, as in that joke - they tried to get "high-tech", then they changed their minds to "high-tech", and now they settled on "to hell with it. " Sadly.
1. The establishment positions itself as a park hotel. It more or less worked out with the hotel - not once with the park, they began to improve the territory and threw it halfway (. In the so-called "lake" it’s not just swimming - you don’t want to walk along the banks. Most of the pavilions on the territory are cluttered, there is ash Jurassic period Plus, two abandoned construction sites adjoin the territory.
2. The concept of the institution. The Cote d'Azur, Provence and all that... It's not clear what side is the beach bar a la Miami and the under-pool instead of the Provencal rural cafe on the territory (and by all indications it was there originally) - it's not clear. Failed.
3. Numbers. Standard - purely double, you can't accommodate a child. Everything is fresh, design a la Provence with a claim to luxury, all appliances function flawlessly. And in all this splendor for three days, not the slightest sign of cleaning was found. It's ridiculous to talk about replacing at least towels. Failed.
4. Nutrition. Breakfasts and lunches, semi-buffet, acceptable in quality - but at a draconian price. Failed.
5. Not a good pool. A collapsible structure chest-deep for a 12-year-old child. And they promised a major... Well, how it fits into the concept of the hotel - I already noted above. Failed.
In general, as in that joke - they tried to get "high-tech", then they changed their minds to "high-tech", and now they settled on "to hell with it. " Sadly.
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Comments (0)
leave a comment
Show other comments …