There are pros and cons

Written: 13 march 2007
Travel time: 13 — 20 march 2007
Who does the author recommend the hotel to?: For a relaxing holiday; For business travel; For families with children
Your rating of this hotel:
8.0
from 10
Hotel ratings by criteria:
Rooms: 9.0
Service: 9.0
Cleanliness: 9.0
Food: 8.0
Amenities: 10.0
We rested with a company of four people (age 38-43), this is not the first time in Sharm El Sheikh.
Negative impressions are made by the conditions of swimming in the sea and the coral reef itself. To swim in the sea, having passed a very long (800 - 1000 meters) panton, it is necessary to climb in slippers for another 30 meters on sharp and uneven stones at a depth to the waist, where the waves push the bather onto the stones. The same story and when leaving the sea. To avoid this, the pantone should be 35-40 meters longer. In this connection, they swam in the sea only once, and then - in the pool. In addition, the hotel is very far from the city.

The rest of the impressions are positive: there is a wonderful water park on the territory (slides, swimming pools, one of the outdoor pools is heated), there are many bars and restaurants on the territory where they cook well and serve excellently (especially if you give a tip).

Huge, well-groomed territory of the hotel, good furniture in the rooms (does not creak, nothing is broken). LTI Grand Azur is aimed primarily at middle-aged Europeans, and this can be seen both in the general infrastructure and in the behavior of the attendants.
The conclusion is up to you.
Translated automatically from Russian. View original