Question about hotel Movenpick Resort Taba 5*
Current tours to this hotel
Get the best price from travel agents
Ask a Question
Ask a question
Related question «Hotel selection»
Which hotel is better to choose?
Can't choose between Hilton and Movenpick.
Please advise on the following criteria:
1. Beach
2. Room
3. Territory
4. Nutrition
5.% of Russian-speaking vacationers
6. Your options
Please advise on the following criteria:
1. Beach
2. Room
3. Territory
4. Nutrition
5.% of Russian-speaking vacationers
6. Your options
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
Answers • 7
I'll try to answer: the beach is definitely better in Movenpick for its size and possibilities for entering the sea, but there is a problem with sunbeds, you can learn about it from many reviews. In addition, the passage through the territory of both beaches of these two hotels is free, please swim, but you can only use your sunbeds. At the Hilton, the beach strip is smaller and narrower, but it also has its own charms: hammocks (only for Hilton members), a pontoon (in principle, for everyone), greenery. I can’t judge the rooms, because I didn’t go to the Hiltons, but in Movenpick we lived in a chic famely room of two rooms, in a quiet area of the main building on the ground floor, and it was very convenient and good. An ideal accommodation option in Movenpick, it seems to me a bungalow, but it also has a different price. There are also bungalows in the Hilton, this is the so-called Nelson Village hotel, but I didn’t see how they were inside either.
Territory: many people write that in Movenpick the territory is bald, and in the Hilton it is green. This is true, but in the heat Movenpick is blown, and Hilton is not, because everything is too compact there, and again, moving from one territory to another is not forbidden. About the rest if you want in an additional letter.
Territory: many people write that in Movenpick the territory is bald, and in the Hilton it is green. This is true, but in the heat Movenpick is blown, and Hilton is not, because everything is too compact there, and again, moving from one territory to another is not forbidden. About the rest if you want in an additional letter.
Like
You like
•
1
answered 15 years ago
We rested in Movenpick: 1. The beach is super, large spacious, we never had any problems with sunbeds - at 8 o’clock my husband went for a morning run and occupied sunbeds, there were plenty of places, and at 11.00 if you come, of course (although not always ) it's harder to find free sunbeds - in the Hilton, in general, the sun loungers are tightly pressed against each other, because there is a very small beach area. The entry into the sea is just super - for both children and adults - a gentle sandy entrance, you can even without shoes. The room - we lived in the main building - on the first floor - a standard room - cozy, always clean, the furniture is new, everything is even very decent. They cleaned it well, regardless of whether I left $ or not. hotel), but there is where to walk. 4. The food is good, only few fruits, barbecue every evening. 5. There were very few Russian speakers, mostly Germans, many French, Hungarians, Poles, Czechs. 6.
We really liked the rest, that year we rested in Taba in Hyatt Movenpick much better (there is only great territory, greenery).
We really liked the rest, that year we rested in Taba in Hyatt Movenpick much better (there is only great territory, greenery).
Like
You like
•
1.5
answered 15 years ago
Movenpick without even thinking
Hilton Taba is an old hotel, destroyed by the Israelis and rebuilt.
It's just awful ... a lot of rooms without a balcony overlooking the Israeli border. A bunch of buses under the windows ...
There is no beach, narrow and the sunbeds are old iron and collapsed ... the bungalows are even more or less there ... in general, a nightmare ...
Movenpick is brand new beautiful and fresh. The rooms are good.
Saw both hotels in September 2008
Hilton Taba is an old hotel, destroyed by the Israelis and rebuilt.
It's just awful ... a lot of rooms without a balcony overlooking the Israeli border. A bunch of buses under the windows ...
There is no beach, narrow and the sunbeds are old iron and collapsed ... the bungalows are even more or less there ... in general, a nightmare ...
Movenpick is brand new beautiful and fresh. The rooms are good.
Saw both hotels in September 2008
Like
You like
•
1
answered 15 years ago
If you like skyscrapers, then Hilton :-) I wouldn’t go to Hilton, I didn’t like it, the territory is small, the main building is a hefty skyscraper, there is nowhere to walk .. I rested in Movenpick and I am very glad that I chose it. I have a review in my passport, read it. If you decide to Movenpick, then take it with a sea view, you won't regret it.
Like
You like
answered 15 years ago
Yes, Movenpick is just the best hotel! The Hiltons all complained that they didn’t like it and the food that we were given for lunch on excursions seemed to them tastier than in hotels! There were no complaints about the food in Movenpick! Everything is wonderful, 3 a la carte restaurants! The beach is great! In general, this is my most hotel! :)
The rooms are new and beautiful! In Hilton, the only plus is the presence of a disco! :) But you can go there from Movenpick for free.
The rooms are new and beautiful! In Hilton, the only plus is the presence of a disco! :) But you can go there from Movenpick for free.
Like
You like
•
1.5
answered 15 years ago
1. Beach
Hilton - unfortunate bridge (pier) and stones on the beach. Part of the beach - green lawns. Narrow coastline for such a large hotel.
Movenpick - the beach is bigger and freer. Although there could be more green spaces. Beside him.
2. Room
Haven't been to the Hilton.
Movenpick - were in a standard room. Everything you need is there and in working order. At first, we were upset that the first floor and the landscape of the mountains, and then we realized that it was better than a balcony to a noisy pool and a truly idiotic animation (although we didn’t go there for it).
3. Territory
Hilton is crushed by saturated development and lack of free space.
Movenpick is more free.
4. Nutrition
Movenpick feeds well, varied. I didn’t like only potatoes and eggplants (they don’t know how to cook these vegetables at all). For dessert (lunch and dinner) there are always oranges, apples, melons/watermelons.
5.% of Russian-speaking vacationers
In my% the same in both hotels - 2-3%.
However, even these 2-3% managed to show themselves not always from the best side in terms of communication with the pervonal and screaming on the beach.
Mostly Poles, but also English and French-speaking citizens. Few Arabs. The crowd is generally good.
6. Your options
Family Vacation - Only Movenpick)
Hilton - unfortunate bridge (pier) and stones on the beach. Part of the beach - green lawns. Narrow coastline for such a large hotel.
Movenpick - the beach is bigger and freer. Although there could be more green spaces. Beside him.
2. Room
Haven't been to the Hilton.
Movenpick - were in a standard room. Everything you need is there and in working order. At first, we were upset that the first floor and the landscape of the mountains, and then we realized that it was better than a balcony to a noisy pool and a truly idiotic animation (although we didn’t go there for it).
3. Territory
Hilton is crushed by saturated development and lack of free space.
Movenpick is more free.
4. Nutrition
Movenpick feeds well, varied. I didn’t like only potatoes and eggplants (they don’t know how to cook these vegetables at all). For dessert (lunch and dinner) there are always oranges, apples, melons/watermelons.
5.% of Russian-speaking vacationers
In my% the same in both hotels - 2-3%.
However, even these 2-3% managed to show themselves not always from the best side in terms of communication with the pervonal and screaming on the beach.
Mostly Poles, but also English and French-speaking citizens. Few Arabs. The crowd is generally good.
6. Your options
Family Vacation - Only Movenpick)
Like
You like
•
½
answered 15 years ago
