Question o Turkey
Ask a Question
Ask a question
Interesting questions
Related question «General issues»
Has anyone flown this year on the "fortune" system? What did you think of it?
Has anyone flown this year on the "fortune" system? What did you think of it?
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
Answers • 4
I treat fortune with great caution.
Usually, according to fortune, neither the best options are offered: either threes or fours, which are not in demand, or fives, but "with an ambush." They can provide a room somewhere in the basement or with a view of the garbage dump, utility yard or a blank fence (you can think of options). I still prefer certainty, not a pig in a poke.
Usually, according to fortune, neither the best options are offered: either threes or fours, which are not in demand, or fives, but "with an ambush." They can provide a room somewhere in the basement or with a view of the garbage dump, utility yard or a blank fence (you can think of options). I still prefer certainty, not a pig in a poke.
Like
You like
•
1
answered 8 years ago
Fortuna is now of a certain stardom, it is immediately indicated: Fortuna 3, Fortuna 4, and so on. It’s not a secret for anyone, you definitely won’t get into a good hotel! All the remnants and places in those hotels that do not buy are "drained" there))))
Like
You like
•
1
answered 8 years ago
But after all, the price of fortune is lower, or the same as a cheap hotel, so I don’t see any risk.
That is, if a person's goal is to save money, then he will a priori choose a cheap hotel, which means not a very good one, as in Fortuna. and if a person wants a good hotel, then he is ready to pay more money, in this case he does not consider Fortune.
Therefore, I don’t see anything wrong with Fortuna: if you want to save money, take Fortuna, knowing in advance that there will be no mega-good option, just as if you had chosen a cheap option of 3,4,5 stars, respectively.
I myself went to Fortuna 4 * - yes, it was not the best four, but the price was cheaper than the cheapest four, so there is nothing to complain about.
That is, if a person's goal is to save money, then he will a priori choose a cheap hotel, which means not a very good one, as in Fortuna. and if a person wants a good hotel, then he is ready to pay more money, in this case he does not consider Fortune.
Therefore, I don’t see anything wrong with Fortuna: if you want to save money, take Fortuna, knowing in advance that there will be no mega-good option, just as if you had chosen a cheap option of 3,4,5 stars, respectively.
I myself went to Fortuna 4 * - yes, it was not the best four, but the price was cheaper than the cheapest four, so there is nothing to complain about.
Like
You like
answered 8 years ago
