Question o Sharm el-Sheikh
Ask a Question
Ask a question
Interesting questions
Related question «Hotel selection»
We choose the hotel again. Tell me your opinion - Hilton Sharks Bay or Concord el salam front? 2 adults are traveling
Thanks
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
Answers • 9
We were in the Hilton in November 2016. Everything is fine We returned from Concord a week ago, we liked it more, although the sea, one might say, is exactly the same But the price of the tour to Concord will be higher
Like
You like
•
1
answered 5 years ago
We were at the Hilton exactly a year ago. Very dirty, both inside and in the restaurant. Breakfasts are terrible, one egg or or, lunch - you need to get the meat. And so it is in everything. Some salads are sour. We changed three numbers. We could go further, but we are already tired. In the end, of course, there was a normal room and a normal cleaner. By the way, he immediately brought us slippers and bathrobes. I don't recommend the Hilton to anyone.
Like
You like
•
1
answered 5 years ago
Personally, I didn’t like Concorde at all, having paid that kind of money, I was disappointed. The rooms are old and not updated. For children, they brought a folding bed in general. Of all the animation, I liked the evening program. It does not pull on the money for which it positions itself.
Like
You like
answered 5 years ago
We were in the Hilton too and a year ago and in October of this year. The sea is wonderful and the reef is beautiful and there are a lot of fish. We didn’t see mud, for breakfast there was even smoked mackerel and ice cream as much as you like (last year), but this year it’s more modest, but there are a lot of meat dishes and a choice of up to 4 types. and everything is very tasty! And to look for the negative - you have to try ... With me, the stewed chicken ended for dinner and the dish from which the chicken was taken turned out to be empty ... a young man immediately ran up and started photographing this situation and an empty dish and 4 waiting people. I think that's something is always wrong with such people: the sea is not warm and the sun is very hot, etc. And Concord and Hilton near the sea are the same and the reef and fish too. Regarding the service, everything changes, they also have not the best of times. I would prefer the Hilton, where we are going again.
Like
You like
•
2.5
answered 5 years ago
I also did not like Concorde precisely because it is not worth the money. There are better, more comfortable and cheaper options. But overall, he's good. It is believed that the Hilton is worse and cheaper than the Concorde.
Like
You like
answered 5 years ago
We were in the Hilton twice, everything is great, the second time they asked for the room in which they lived for the first time, new, spacious with a view of the small pool, the main thing is that it is quiet there. Husband loved smoked fish for breakfast. The choice is not great, but quite tasty. In January it is very cozy, calm. Concorde is always more expensive.
Like
You like
•
1
answered 5 years ago
Were in Hilton April-May of this year. We lived on the second line, there are newer and bigger rooms and large pools))To the sea carries a bus every half an hour or on foot (about 5-7 minutes). The choice of food was always and in sufficient quantity (in this sense - a solid 4*+). We got to a staff shift (they work there like a shift method), with the first cook the dishes were spicier and dried, with the second cook they were slightly undersalted and not fried, but rather stewed (as I like)). There are no complaints about the hotel and food at all (we ate on the second line). But the beach was a little disappointing: it was small and there were always no places near the water. The beach is 4-level and at 10 am it was difficult to find 2 places under an umbrella (no umbrellas, under the scorching sun, there were places). Overall impression - liked it
Like
You like
answered 5 years ago
