Question o Ukraine
Ask a Question
Ask a question
Interesting questions
Topics questionа
Related question «Countries and cities»
Which city is better to go to?
Good afternoon! My husband and I, after much deliberation, decided to go to the Crimea. We can not decide on the city. We decide between Evpatoria and Feodosia, because it is convenient to get to these cities, there is a direct train. Which of these cities is more interesting, livelier? Where is it better? We wanted to go to Yalta at first, but they say that it is expensive and inconvenient to get there.
Translated automatically from Russian. View original
Subscribe
Answers • 50
from Feodosia, a minibus to Koktebel is 20 minutes. And it will be more interesting :)
Like
You like
•
½
answered 11 years ago
Better to Feodosia, there goes the train. From the Station you can take a bus to Sudak, Sudak is nearby. But still, it’s better to go to Miskhor, there is real Crimea ...
Like
You like
•
½
answered 11 years ago
Waldemar, why do you need Sudak if Koktebel is closer and better? :))
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
Sudak is still more picturesque, a park, a fortress, a "cozy" bay, etc.
Although, if you go to the Crimea, it’s better to Gaspra, Miskhor, I like it much more there
Although, if you go to the Crimea, it’s better to Gaspra, Miskhor, I like it much more there
Like
You like
•
3
answered 11 years ago
Of course, if the budget is limited, then it is better to go to Feodosia (railway), then either Planerskoye, as mentioned above, or the village. "Coastal" (6 km from Feodosia) "Golden Beach"...
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
If without children, it is better to go to Feodosia. In my opinion, Evpatoria is more for children.
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
In fact, in the Crimea, you can leave Simferopol by minibuses to any place. so don’t get hung up on trains. Of the ones you have chosen, Feodosia is definitely better than Evpatoria. But these are cities, there are many villages along the coast, Sudak is considered the capital of the Eastern Crimea. and not very crowded with vacationers.
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
and that, and that - bullshit. Sevastopol meets your requirements - a beautiful, long embankment, a clean, well-groomed city, a lot of places for a walk.
I proceed from personal experience. You will always have time to visit the villages.
I proceed from personal experience. You will always have time to visit the villages.
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
Thanks a lot for the feedback! I would like to be in a big, lively city. I don’t like quiet villages. My husband wants to go to Yalta. I don't know if I'll buy tickets soon :(
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
and it will be interesting for my husband to sail next to hefty military ships when sailing to Inkerman.
There is also a boat that takes you to the beach, like Kirillovka (UAH 3).
There is also a boat that takes you to the beach, like Kirillovka (UAH 3).
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
People go to Yalta for parties. Indeed, the embankment, especially in the evening, is impressive, there are many cafes and restaurants. artists on the embankment ... But you will be disappointed by the sea, it is muddy, dirty in Yalta, there are a lot of people ... Miskhor is much better, and there are places to take a walk, and the beaches are good. If the budget is modest, then take "Ai Petri", if there is money, then "Dulber"
Like
You like
•
1
answered 11 years ago
Tomb Artur! Well, if for you Koktebel, Alushta, Gurzuf, Miskhor - villages, Crimea you don’t know. and not to see the beauties of the coast of the South Coast, where the sea is nearby and you don’t have to go by boat to buy up, the South Coast is the subtropics, Sevastopol does not belong to them. This is not for me!
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
alex45, I agree 100%, Sevastopol is not that, it does not have a subtropical mood (palm trees, magnolias, cypresses, air, mountains). Miskhor is a rather lively resort town. and the embankment in the evening, and the park, near Alupka. The sea in Miskhor is clean, there are many places. where you can stay...
Like
You like
•
1.5
answered 11 years ago
alex45I wrote that I come from personal experience, because I was in: Yalta, Sevas, Sudak, Alupka, Alushta, Gurzuf, Miskhor, Feodosia, etc.
Compared to Sevas, the whole village.
Compared to Sevas, the whole village.
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
Myrka741 writes that they want to go to Crimea, they considered Yalta, but changed their minds - it's expensive. "Crimea" (the southern coast of Crimea), in my understanding, is the coast from Sudak to Simeiz ... From Alupka to Simeiz everything will be more expensive than Feodosia, From Alupka to Feodosia a little cheaper, but not much. Yalta is a special case, but I do not advise you, you will be disappointed in the sea (bad, a lot of people).
Like
You like
•
½
answered 11 years ago
For reference - the southern coast of Crimea is the area from Foros to the big Alushta, including the so-called Greater Yalta, further east to Feodosia with Sudak - Eastern Crimea, the Evpatoria region, Donuzlav-Western Krama region. Conditions in these regions are different, dry subtropics are only the South Coast. Eastern Crimea is sea air with steppe air. Sevastopol has never been a resort city, it is a port, it is the base of the Black Sea Fleet, in short, a working and port city.
And, compared to Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk, it’s a village, although there are good places near the Dnieper, but you can’t call it a resort, like Sevastopol!
And, compared to Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk, it’s a village, although there are good places near the Dnieper, but you can’t call it a resort, like Sevastopol!
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
alex45. I wrote ".. in my understanding .." South Coast is "... from Sudak to Simeiz ...". Neither Western Crimea nor Eastern Crimea are of interest to me. You gave the official interpretation in the certificate. SUBK is MISHOR!!!
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
I am writing about what I know - the Sudak region with Novy Svet, Morskoy and up to Rybachy in one direction and to Koktebel and Feodosia - in the other - this is Eastern Crimea, where nature is a little different than on the South Coast, so you greatly stretched the South Coast already to Sudak. The South Coast is not only Miskhor, but also Partenit and Utes, and the same Big Yalta, along with Gurzuf and Alupka. Why argue, type in the South Coast search engine. What will be displayed?
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
Here is from the search engine - "The Southern Coast of Crimea (South Coast) is a region stretching along the coast in a narrow strip from Alushta to Foros, including more than 30 settlements."
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
Although I do not reject the Sudak region, there are wonderful places there, near Kara-Dag, for example. But the nature is already mountainous-steppe, junipers instead of palm trees. the old parks of Crimea, the Vorontsov Palace takes only architecture, by the way, Pushkin was at the Raevskys there.
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
I also know all this, I have been almost everywhere in the Crimea and rested in many places. I know firsthand what Feodosia and Sudak are ... You didn’t open the news to me. Moreover, I did not intend to argue with you. To list all the places from Alushta to Foros is nonsense. That's why I immediately wrote "in my understanding of the South Coast is ...". For me, the South Coast is Miskhor and Gaspra. For Wikipedia, the South Coast - from Foros to Bolshaya Alushta ... For those who raised the question, Myrka741, the South Coast is Feodosia and Evpatoria .... But not for me ...
Like
You like
•
1
answered 11 years ago
alex45. Here you write about Sudak "... nature is already mountainous-steppe, junipers instead of palm trees ..." I wrote about this above that there should be palm trees, cypresses and magnolias - a sign of a subtropic, albeit a meager, dry subtropic ... In general, your knowledge is clear, credit!
Like
You like
•
1
answered 11 years ago
Thank you for a pleasant conversation, and yet look into this corner between Partenit and Utes - a grove of Italian pines, the only weeping cypress in Crimea, a bamboo grove in the Karasan sanatorium, a little further the best kebabs in Crimea on logs from an old grape vine, then a basement where good wines are not standard Massandra wines, but from a local winery (I haven’t seen them in Crimea anymore), for example, “from Raevsky’s estate.” In Partenit, the Turks made a park, well, it’s also wonderful.
Like
You like
•
½
answered 11 years ago
Yes, and the area is not worn out, unlike Yalta and Alushta, just for our age.
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
I was visiting friends in a military sanatorium in Partenit, though for a long time ... I was resting in Gurzuf in the Military sanatorium in the building with the "Fountain Night
http://migranov.ru/crimea/gurzuf/33.php
http://migranov.ru/crimea/gurzuf/33.php
Like
You like
•
½
answered 11 years ago
After reading all the reviews, I'm even more confused! How many people, so many opinions) Everyone likes his own.
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
Myrka741, Well, why. To your question, which is better than Evpatoria or Feodosia, everyone answered you that Feodosia (railway) is better, from there you can go to Sudak and Planerskoye, and very close to Beregovoe (Golden Beach), but this is not quite the South Coast (there is no effect of subtropics ).
South Coast - this is from Alushta to Foros (I think to Simeiz). Yalta is expensive and the sea is muddy.
The brightest town on the South Coast is Miskhor. If the budget is tight, then dignity. "Ai Petri", if it's not a pity, then "Dulber" or "Sea surf" ...
South Coast - this is from Alushta to Foros (I think to Simeiz). Yalta is expensive and the sea is muddy.
The brightest town on the South Coast is Miskhor. If the budget is tight, then dignity. "Ai Petri", if it's not a pity, then "Dulber" or "Sea surf" ...
Like
You like
answered 11 years ago
I also confirm. Set the task easier - what you want, a bright vacation with excursions, so that beautiful landscapes, the sea is nearby, then on the South Coast, any place that you like according to the descriptions. Descriptions can be found on the Internet. The fact that the trains reach Evpatoria and Feodosia are not the main thing, all trains come to Simferopol, there is a bus station on the station square, from where buses and minibuses go to any corner of Crimea. There is also a trolleybus that goes to the South Coast through Alushta to Yalta. So how to get there is not the main thing. Now, if you can’t get into sanatoriums, now there are so many mini-hotels that you can also find accommodation at your own cost. The only thing is, don’t rush to grab the first thing they offer you, you need to look. Crimea, that's what your soul will have, you can go there.
Like
You like
•
½
answered 11 years ago
Show more »
All questions
Ukraine
more ▼ ▲